%PDF-1.2 %âãÏÓ 10 0 obj << /Length 11 0 R >> stream BT 305.76 745.44 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -216 -706.08 TD ( ) Tj ET q 516 36.48 6.24 13.44 re h W n BT 516 39.36 TD 0.24 Tc 0 Tw (1) Tj ET Q BT 155.04 709.44 TD /F1 12 Tf -0.0165 Tc 0.0165 Tw (NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION) Tj 301.44 0 TD 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -265.44 -13.92 TD 0.132 Tc 0 Tw (I) Tj 4.32 0 TD -0.156 Tc (-) Tj 3.84 0 TD 0.1752 Tc (295/I) Tj 26.4 0 TD -0.156 Tc (-) Tj 3.84 0 TD 0.0431 Tc -0.1631 Tw (76/NJ 42 Interchange Reconstruction) Tj 191.04 0 TD 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -114.72 -13.44 TD /F0 12 Tf ( ) Tj -102.24 -13.92 TD -0.0142 Tc 0.2142 Tw (Community Advisory Committee Meeting) Tj 204 0 TD 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -182.88 -13.92 TD 0.0563 Tc -0.0163 Tw (August 20, 2002 ) Tj 83.04 0 TD 0.24 Tc 0 Tw (\226) Tj 6.24 0 TD -0.174 Tc 0.054 Tw ( 6:30) Tj 24 0 TD -0.156 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.84 0 TD -0.054 Tc -0.066 Tw (8:30 p.m.) Tj 45.12 0 TD 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -168.96 -13.92 TD -0.0039 Tc -0.1161 Tw (Bellmawr Mutual Housing Complex) Tj 175.2 0 TD /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj -303.36 -13.44 TD /F0 12 Tf -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 168.48 -13.92 TD /F1 12 Tf -0.0694 Tc -0.0506 Tw (Meeting Summary) Tj 95.04 0 TD 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -263.52 -13.92 TD /F0 12 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0739 Tc 0.4339 Tw (CAC Meeting Attendees) Tj ET 89.76 584.64 108.96 0.48 re f BT 198.72 586.08 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 35.04 0 TD ( ) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -216 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0442 Tc 0.1642 Tw (2 Bellmawr Residents) Tj 97.44 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -97.44 -12.96 TD -0.0946 Tc 0.2146 Tw (Mt. ) Tj 18.24 0 TD -0.0257 Tc 0.1457 Tw (Ephraim Girls Softball Association) Tj 154.56 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -172.8 -12.48 TD -0.0603 Tc 0.3003 Tw (Borough of Bellmawr Highway Department) Tj 193.92 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -193.92 -12.48 TD -0.0665 Tc 0.3065 Tw (Borough of Bellmawr Sewer Department) Tj 180.96 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -180.96 -12.96 TD -0.0584 Tc 0.1784 Tw (Center for Independent Living) Tj 133.44 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -133.44 -12.48 TD -0.059 Tc 0.419 Tw (Chair, Bellmawr Senior Citizen Association) Tj 193.92 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 22.08 0 TD ( ) Tj -216 -12.96 TD -0.0493 Tc 0.1693 Tw (Camden Co. Council on Economic Opportunity) Tj 209.76 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -209.76 -12.48 TD -0.0614 Tc 0.1814 Tw (Mt. Ephraim Resident) Tj 96.96 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -96.96 -12.48 TD 0.0188 Tc 0.1012 Tw (Dir., D) Tj 31.2 0 TD -0.065 Tc 0.425 Tw (iocesian Administered Cemeteries) Tj 150.72 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -181.92 -12.96 TD -0.0442 Tc 0.1642 Tw (2 Gloucester City Residents) Tj 123.36 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -123.36 -12.48 TD -0.059 Tc 0.419 Tw (Chair, Bellmawr Senior Citizen Association) Tj 193.44 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -193.44 -12.48 TD 0.0032 Tc -0.1232 Tw (Diocese of Camden) Tj 86.88 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -86.88 -12.96 TD -0.0868 Tc 0.2068 Tw (Bellmawr Seniors) Tj 79.2 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -79.2 -12.48 TD -0.0577 Tc 0.6577 Tw (Bellmawr Baseball) Tj 83.52 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -83.52 -12.48 TD -0.0435 Tc 0.3235 Tw (Bellmawr Park Mutual Housing) Tj 140.64 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -140.64 -12.96 TD -0.0322 Tc 0.2322 Tw (Trustee, Old Pine Farm Natural Lands Trust) Tj 194.88 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -194.88 -12.48 TD -0.025 Tc 0.145 Tw (Chair, Transportation Commi) Tj 130.08 0 TD -0.0145 Tc 0.1345 Tw (ttee, Southern NJ Chamber of Commerce) Tj 182.4 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -312.48 -12.48 TD -0.0572 Tc 0.1772 Tw (Director, AAA South Jersey Public Affairs) Tj 189.6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -189.6 -12.96 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0362 Tc 0.1562 Tw (Project Team Attendees) Tj ET 89.76 293.76 106.08 0.48 re f BT 195.84 295.2 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -106.08 -12.48 TD -0.0672 Tc 0.3072 Tw (Bill Beans \(New Jersey DOT\)) Tj 132 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -132 -12.96 TD -0.0574 Tc 0.2974 Tw (Nick Caiazza \(New Jersey DOT\)) Tj 144.96 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -144.96 -12.48 TD -0.0365 Tc 0.1565 Tw (Patricia Feliciano \(New Jersey DOT\)) Tj 163.2 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -163.2 -12.48 TD -0.059 Tc 0.299 Tw (Steven Maslow \(New Jersey DOT\)) Tj 154.08 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -154.08 -12.96 TD -0.1037 Tc 0.3437 Tw (Bruce Riegel \(New Jersey ) Tj 117.6 0 TD 0.0091 Tc 0 Tw (DOT\)) Tj 25.92 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -143.52 -12.48 TD -0.0386 Tc 0.1586 Tw (Michael Russo \(New Jersey DOT\)) Tj 151.68 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -151.68 -12.48 TD -0.0947 Tc 0.6947 Tw (Charlie Meidhof \(Dewberry) Tj 123.36 0 TD 0.1637 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.36 0 TD 0.0161 Tc 0.1039 Tw (Goodkind, Inc.\)) Tj 70.08 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -196.8 -12.96 TD -0.0593 Tc 0.1793 Tw (Lou Robbins \(Dewberry) Tj 107.52 0 TD 0.1637 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.36 0 TD 0.0161 Tc 0.1039 Tw (Goodkind, Inc.\)) Tj 70.08 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -180.96 -12.48 TD -0.0706 Tc 0.4306 Tw (Arnold Bloch \(Howard/Stein) Tj 127.68 0 TD 0.1637 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.36 0 TD 0.0674 Tc 0.0526 Tw (Hudson Assoc.\)) Tj 71.04 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -202.08 -12.48 TD -0.0614 Tc 0.4214 Tw (Stephanie Brooks \(Howard/Stein) Tj 145.44 0 TD 0.1637 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.36 0 TD 0.0674 Tc 0.0526 Tw (Hudson Assoc.\)) Tj 71.04 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -219.84 -12.96 TD -0.0473 Tc 0.1673 Tw (Karen Rosenberger \(Howard/Stein) Tj 152.64 0 TD 0.1637 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.36 0 TD 0.0674 Tc 0.0526 Tw (Hudson Assoc.\)) Tj 71.04 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -227.04 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0091 Tc 0 Tw (Summ) Tj 28.32 0 TD -0.0594 Tc (ary) Tj ET 89.76 129.6 42.24 0.48 re f BT 132 131.04 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -42.24 -12.96 TD -0.0505 Tc 0.2074 Tw (Arnold Bloch opened the meeting, and asked each Community Advisory Committee \(CAC\) and ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0535 Tc 0.2018 Tw (project team member to introduce him or herself. Bill Beans followed with a project overview. ) Tj T* -0.0616 Tc 0.2252 Tw (Arnold Bloch discussed the roles and responsibilities of the CAC. Lo) Tj 307.68 0 TD -0.062 Tc 0.182 Tw (u Robbins summarized the ) Tj -307.68 -12.96 TD -0.0434 Tc 0.1634 Tw (draft Purpose and Needs Statement. This was followed by a Question and Answer session. ) Tj 406.56 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 11 0 obj 6410 endobj 4 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 5 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F1 8 0 R /F2 12 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 10 0 R >> endobj 19 0 obj << /Length 20 0 R >> stream BT 305.76 745.44 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -216 -706.08 TD ( ) Tj ET q 516 36.48 6.24 13.44 re h W n BT 516 39.36 TD 0.24 Tc 0 Tw (2) Tj ET Q BT 89.76 710.4 TD /F0 11.04 Tf 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0246 Tc 0.1446 Tw (Summary of Question and Answer Session) Tj ET 89.76 696.48 189.12 0.48 re f BT 278.88 697.92 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -189.12 -12.96 TD /F3 11.04 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0402 Tc 0.1602 Tw (One CAC member wanted to know whether or not various intersections and traffic circles, ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0887 Tc 0.2087 Tw (which he cha) Tj 58.08 0 TD -0.0405 Tc 0.1605 Tw (racterized as "dangerous", will be addressed in the highway reconstruction, and ) Tj -58.08 -12.48 TD -0.048 Tc 0.168 Tw (whether or not the public will be made aware of where and when construction will begin. ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0261 Tc 0.1461 Tw (Project Team members responded that a good share of the alternatives screening process ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0734 Tc 0.3305 Tw (consists of determining what work outside of the interchange will be included in the ) Tj T* -0.0389 Tc 0.2462 Tw (reconstruction effort. It was specifically noted that improvements to two locations ) Tj 363.84 0 TD 0.24 Tc 0 Tw (\226) Tj 5.76 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -369.6 -12.96 TD -0.0545 Tc 0.2618 Tw (Brooklawn Circle and the intersection of Route 168 and Beinigno Blvd. ) Tj 319.2 0 TD 0.24 Tc 0 Tw (\226) Tj 5.76 0 TD -0.1233 Tc 0.2433 Tw ( are under cur) Tj 60 0 TD -0.0918 Tc -0.2682 Tw (rent ) Tj -384.96 -12.48 TD -0.0266 Tc 0.1166 Tw (study within NJDOT as separate projects. The public will be kept abreast of the alternatives ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0222 Tc 0.1422 Tw (screening via this CAC group and public meetings.) Tj 225.12 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -243.36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0475 Tc 0.1375 Tw (Questions were raised as to how the Project Team plans on dealing with the effect that ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0099 Tc 0.1299 Tw (reconstruction will) Tj 82.08 0 TD -0.0674 Tc 0.2834 Tw ( have on underground utilities. Bill Beans responded that a key tool in the ) Tj -82.08 -12.96 TD -0.0534 Tc 0.2054 Tw (reconstruction process is the use of existing utility maps, to inform team members where each ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0753 Tc 0.3365 Tw (utility area is located. By doing so, the team will have an idea of which utilities ) Tj 354.24 0 TD -0.0593 Tc 0.0193 Tw (will be most ) Tj -354.24 -12.48 TD -0.0404 Tc 0.1604 Tw (affected by the final chosen alternative.) Tj 173.28 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -191.52 -12.96 TD ( ) Tj 266.88 0 TD ( ) Tj -266.88 -12.96 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0611 Tc 0.2154 Tw (One CAC member asked whether or not reconstruction includes fixing the bridge near Creek ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0466 Tc 0.1366 Tw (Road. Project Team members replied that the bridge is scheduled for repairs in early spring ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0854 Tc 0.2054 Tw (of next year, but) Tj 71.52 0 TD -0.0235 Tc 0.1435 Tw ( that this is not connected to the I) Tj 146.4 0 TD 0.1637 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.84 0 TD 0.0429 Tc (295/I) Tj 23.04 0 TD 0.1637 Tc (-) Tj 3.84 0 TD -0.0811 Tc 0.5211 Tw (76/NJ 42 interchange reconstruction.) Tj 162.24 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -429.12 -12.96 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0631 Tc 0.2431 Tw (A number of CAC members were curious as to how the Missing Moves project will affect I) Tj 403.2 0 TD 0.1637 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj -403.2 -12.96 TD -0.1491 Tc (295/I) Tj 23.04 0 TD 0.1637 Tc (-) Tj 3.36 0 TD -0.0623 Tc 0.3823 Tw (76/NJ 42 reconstruction, and whether Missing Moves will improve local road access ) Tj -26.4 -12.48 TD -0.0386 Tc 0.1586 Tw (and relieve congestion off I) Tj 120.96 0 TD 0.1637 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.36 0 TD -0.0641 Tc 0.3441 Tw (295 and NJ 42. Charlie Meidhof replied that The Missing Moves ) Tj -124.32 -12.96 TD -0.0614 Tc 0.2774 Tw (Project is a distinctly separate project. He described Missing Moves efforts being made to ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0609 Tc 0.2178 Tw (provide two ramps which do not current exist, which, in tandem with the ) Tj 323.04 0 TD 0.1637 Tc 0 Tw (I) Tj 3.36 0 TD (-) Tj 3.84 0 TD 0.0429 Tc (295/I) Tj 23.04 0 TD 0.1637 Tc (-) Tj 3.84 0 TD -0.0649 Tc -0.0551 Tw (76/NJ 42 ) Tj -357.12 -12.48 TD -0.0487 Tc 0.2373 Tw (reconstruction, will reduce the traffic bottleneck in local roads. Other concerns were raised by ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0508 Tc 0.3453 Tw (CAC about the Missing Moves project, specifically, regarding potential weaving movements ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0279 Tc 0.2679 Tw (between traffic entering from I) Tj 135.36 0 TD 0.1637 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.84 0 TD 0.006 Tc 0.114 Tw (295 and wishing to st) Tj 94.56 0 TD -0.0617 Tc 0.2297 Tw (ay on 42 and traffic on 42 that wishes to ) Tj -233.76 -12.48 TD -0.0581 Tc 0.1528 Tw (exit on 55 or stay 42. Another concern was the current narrowing down of Route 42 from 4 ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0561 Tc 0.2028 Tw (to 3 lanes in the vicinity of Route 55. Both these concerns will be addressed by NJDOT, ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0592 Tc 0.1792 Tw (either as part of the I) Tj 91.2 0 TD 0.1637 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.36 0 TD -0.0531 Tc (295/I) Tj 23.52 0 TD 0.1637 Tc (-) Tj 3.36 0 TD 0.1011 Tc (76/NJ) Tj 26.4 0 TD -0.0607 Tc 0.3407 Tw ( 42 reconstruction project or the Missing Moves project. ) Tj 251.04 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -417.12 -12.96 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0501 Tc 0.2341 Tw (Questions were raised as to whether or not the reconstruction itself has already been approved ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0851 Tc 0.3651 Tw (and will move forward. Bill Beans replied that there is no question of the need for this ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.1036 Tc 0.4636 Tw (project in t) Tj 47.52 0 TD -0.0472 Tc 0.2015 Tw (he minds of the local officials, residents and authorities and therefore at this time ) Tj -47.52 -12.96 TD -0.0684 Tc 0.3164 Tw (the project moving forward. The issue at hand is what is the best reconstruction alternative ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0294 Tc 0.218 Tw (that minimizes impact yet still achieves project goals.) Tj 236.16 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -254.4 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.44 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0612 Tc 0.1812 Tw (CAC members wondered) Tj 111.84 0 TD -0.0434 Tc 0.1634 Tw ( what exactly in this reconstruction process is different than the ) Tj -111.84 -12.96 TD -0.0533 Tc 0.1733 Tw (earlier construction done in the area during the 1950'5 and '60's. Lou Robbins replied that ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0543 Tc 0.2085 Tw (this project is complying with social and environmental regulations that were not even in ) Tj T* -0.0527 Tc 0 Tw (existe) Tj 25.44 0 TD -0.0784 Tc 0.3091 Tw (nce forty years ago, and is progressing in a more fair and inclusive manner.) Tj 331.2 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -374.88 -12.96 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0741 Tc 0.2541 Tw (A CAC member asked if there were any pre) Tj 193.44 0 TD 0.1637 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.36 0 TD -0.015 Tc 0.015 Tw (existing prohibitive regulations against ) Tj -196.8 -12.96 TD -0.0497 Tc 0.1697 Tw (reconstructing within any area, such as the cemetery. Project Team members responded that ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD 0.0282 Tc 0.0918 Tw (at pr) Tj 19.68 0 TD -0.0313 Tc 0.2113 Tw (esent they are not aware of any such restrictions.) Tj 214.56 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -252.48 -12.96 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 20 0 obj 8189 endobj 14 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 5 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F2 12 0 R /F3 15 0 R /F4 17 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 19 0 R >> endobj 22 0 obj << /Length 23 0 R >> stream BT 305.76 745.44 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -216 -706.08 TD ( ) Tj ET q 516 36.48 6.24 13.44 re h W n BT 516 39.36 TD 0.24 Tc 0 Tw (3) Tj ET Q BT 89.76 709.92 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.061 Tc 0.2375 Tw (Brief questions were asked about double ramps and the influx of more traffic and noise in the ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0616 Tc 0.1516 Tw (area, and the lack of sound walls. Project Team members responded that CAC members will ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0433 Tc 0.1633 Tw (have opportunities to) Tj 93.12 0 TD -0.0606 Tc 0.1463 Tw ( provide input on the development of noise walls. Part of the reason why ) Tj -93.12 -12.96 TD -0.0407 Tc 0.1307 Tw (noise walls do not exist in certain areas is due to technical difficulties that made such ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.082 Tc 0.442 Tw (construction very difficult.) Tj 117.12 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -135.36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.44 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0346 Tc 0.1066 Tw (In response to queries from the CAC, Project Team members stres) Tj 292.32 0 TD -0.0403 Tc 0.1603 Tw (sed that the I) Tj 56.64 0 TD 0.1637 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.36 0 TD 0.0429 Tc (295/I) Tj 23.52 0 TD 0.1637 Tc (-) Tj 3.36 0 TD -0.0909 Tc -0.2691 Tw (76/NJ ) Tj -379.2 -12.96 TD -0.0585 Tc 0.2585 Tw (42 interchange reconstruction will be coordinated with the Missing Moves study, Brooklawn ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0536 Tc 0.2018 Tw (Circle project, and a study by the New Jersey Turnpike for an Rt 42 Interchange. These ) Tj T* -0.0216 Tc 0.2216 Tw (studies are geared towards reducing traffic congest) Tj 224.16 0 TD -0.0856 Tc 0.2656 Tw (ion and improving safety in the region. ) Tj -224.16 -12.96 TD -0.0575 Tc 0.1775 Tw (CAC members will be informed of the status of all three projects throughout their ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD 0.0179 Tc 0 Tw (developments.) Tj 63.84 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -82.08 -12.96 TD /F3 11.04 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0519 Tc 0.2061 Tw (CAC members asked if they would be informed of construction alternatives prior to the ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0714 Tc 0.1914 Tw (October CAC meeting. Lou Robbin) Tj 159.84 0 TD -0.055 Tc 0.2187 Tw (s and Bill Beans both replied that a package would be ) Tj -159.84 -12.48 TD -0.0522 Tc 0.144 Tw (sent to each CAC member before the meeting, so that members can have time to look over ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0151 Tc 0.0751 Tw (the various alternatives and develop their comments and suggestions.) Tj 304.8 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -323.04 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0677 Tc 0.2477 Tw (CAC members asked if there is room for discus) Tj 209.76 0 TD -0.0382 Tc 0.0622 Tw (sion of multiple solutions/alternatives that ) Tj -209.76 -12.96 TD -0.0401 Tc 0.0916 Tw (would address small sections of the highways, instead of an overall reconstruction. Bill ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0492 Tc 0.1692 Tw (Beans replied that a study has already been done on multiple interchange reconstruction ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0117 Tc 0.0357 Tw (benefits of small project areas. ) Tj 137.76 0 TD -0.057 Tc 0.2207 Tw ( It was determined that only a small percentage of traffic ) Tj -137.76 -12.48 TD -0.0499 Tc 0.1999 Tw (congestion would be relieved by such projects. In order to provide the most congestion relief, ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0511 Tc 0.2397 Tw (the entire highway interchange needs to be reconfigured.) Tj 249.6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -267.84 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0768 Tc 0.2568 Tw (In a similar vein, CAC members asked if bus) Tj 198.72 0 TD -0.0711 Tc 0.1911 Tw ( lanes and/or transit had been considered. Team ) Tj -198.72 -12.96 TD -0.0499 Tc 0.2499 Tw (members responded that bus lanes, like multiple construction in small areas, provided ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0565 Tc 0.2107 Tw (benefits that were minimal in comparison to the need for congestion relief and safety ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0509 Tc 0.1709 Tw (improvements in the entire area. T) Tj 154.08 0 TD -0.0503 Tc 0.2236 Tw (ransit was also determined as not effective enough, since ) Tj -154.08 -12.48 TD -0.0605 Tc 0.237 Tw (travel patterns in the area do not occur directly from point A to B, but instead include ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0554 Tc 0.2439 Tw (multiple trips that only freeway reconstruction can address. Still, transit options will be ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD 0.0512 Tc -0.1712 Tw (considered as pa) Tj 72.96 0 TD -0.092 Tc 0.212 Tw (rt of this project.) Tj 72.96 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -164.16 -12.48 TD /F3 11.04 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -13.44 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0703 Tc 0.2863 Tw (One CAC member asked whether funding was in place yet for condemnation of property. ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0607 Tc 0.2371 Tw (Bill Beans replied that the project is still in the early stages prior to any considerations of ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.043 Tc 0.067 Tw (property takings. He stressed that later on the team ) Tj 228.48 0 TD -0.043 Tc 0.103 Tw (will do a detailed look at exactly which ) Tj -228.48 -12.96 TD -0.0434 Tc 0.1334 Tw (properties will be affected by each alternative being considered. This effort will be done with ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.1241 Tc 0.2441 Tw (CAC input.) Tj 50.4 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -68.64 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F3 11.04 Tf -0.0106 Tc -0.1094 Tw (CAC Commitment ) Tj 83.52 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -83.52 -12.96 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0428 Tc 0.0889 Tw (Bill Beans stressed that CAC commitment and consistency is imperative to a successful ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.1454 Tc 0 Tw (alte) Tj 15.84 0 TD -0.0143 Tc 0.1343 Tw (rnatives decision) Tj 73.92 0 TD 0.1637 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.84 0 TD -0.0439 Tc 0.1159 Tw (making process, and asked that each CAC member think realistically ) Tj -93.6 -12.48 TD -0.0523 Tc 0.2006 Tw (about his or her time commitments to the project. He then suggested that if any CAC ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0488 Tc 0.2031 Tw (member found that consistent attendance was going to be difficult, to please let us kn) Tj 374.88 0 TD 0.0536 Tc 0.0664 Tw (ow so ) Tj -374.88 -12.48 TD -0.07 Tc 0.3029 Tw (that another representative could be found to attend in their place. This will help in that ) Tj 0 -12.48 TD -0.0358 Tc 0.1558 Tw (particular issues would be consistently addressed, and their communities kept abreast of ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD 0.0147 Tc 0.1053 Tw (project developments.) Tj 97.44 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -115.68 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 23 0 obj 7171 endobj 21 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 5 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F2 12 0 R /F3 15 0 R /F4 17 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 22 0 R >> endobj 25 0 obj << /Length 26 0 R >> stream BT 305.76 745.44 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -216 -706.08 TD ( ) Tj ET q 516 36.48 6.24 13.44 re h W n BT 516 39.36 TD 0.24 Tc 0 Tw (4) Tj ET Q BT 89.76 710.4 TD /F3 11.04 Tf -0.038 Tc 0.158 Tw (Action Items) Tj 54.72 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -54.72 -12.96 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0448 Tc 0.1648 Tw (CAC members requested a glossary) Tj 157.44 0 TD -0.0541 Tc 0.0781 Tw ( sheet, which Lou Robbins said is forthcoming and will ) Tj -157.44 -12.96 TD -0.0748 Tc 0.1948 Tw (be included in the next CAC meeting.) Tj 166.08 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -184.32 -12.96 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.2016 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.28 0 TD /F2 11.04 Tf 0 Tc -0.1891 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F0 11.04 Tf -0.0498 Tc 0.3069 Tw (CAC members will receive information about the first) Tj 238.56 0 TD 0.1637 Tc 0 Tw (-) Tj 3.36 0 TD -0.0261 Tc 0.1461 Tw (cut alternatives prior to the next CAC ) Tj -241.92 -12.96 TD -0.0496 Tc -0.0704 Tw (meeting, tentatively ) Tj 89.76 0 TD -0.0886 Tc 0 Tw (schedule) Tj 38.4 0 TD -0.0528 Tc 0.1728 Tw ( for October 2002.) Tj 81.6 0 TD 0 Tc 0.12 Tw ( ) Tj -228 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 26 0 obj 1273 endobj 24 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 5 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F0 6 0 R /F2 12 0 R /F3 15 0 R /F4 17 0 R >> /ProcSet 2 0 R >> /Contents 25 0 R >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F0 /BaseFont /TimesNewRoman /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 250 333 408 500 500 833 778 180 333 333 500 564 250 333 250 278 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 278 278 564 564 564 444 921 722 667 667 722 611 556 722 722 333 389 722 611 889 722 722 556 722 667 556 611 722 722 944 722 722 611 333 278 333 469 500 333 444 500 444 500 444 333 500 500 278 278 500 278 778 500 500 500 500 333 389 278 500 500 722 500 500 444 480 200 480 541 778 500 778 333 500 444 1000 500 500 333 1000 556 333 889 778 611 778 778 333 333 444 444 350 500 1000 333 980 389 333 722 778 444 722 250 333 500 500 500 500 200 500 333 760 276 500 564 333 760 500 400 549 300 300 333 576 453 250 333 300 310 500 750 750 750 444 722 722 722 722 722 722 889 667 611 611 611 611 333 333 333 333 722 722 722 722 722 722 722 564 722 722 722 722 722 722 556 500 444 444 444 444 444 444 667 444 444 444 444 444 278 278 278 278 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 549 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /FontDescriptor 7 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /TimesNewRoman /Flags 34 /FontBBox [ -250 -216 1160 1000 ] /MissingWidth 322 /StemV 73 /StemH 73 /ItalicAngle 0 /CapHeight 891 /XHeight 446 /Ascent 891 /Descent -216 /Leading 149 /MaxWidth 967 /AvgWidth 401 >> endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F1 /BaseFont /TimesNewRoman,Bold /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 250 333 555 500 500 1000 833 278 333 333 500 570 250 333 250 278 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 333 333 570 570 570 500 930 722 667 722 722 667 611 778 778 389 500 778 667 944 722 778 611 778 722 556 667 722 722 1000 722 722 667 333 278 333 581 500 333 500 556 444 556 444 333 500 556 278 333 556 278 833 556 500 556 556 444 389 333 556 500 722 500 500 444 394 220 394 520 778 500 778 333 500 500 1000 500 500 333 1000 556 333 1000 778 667 778 778 333 333 500 500 350 500 1000 333 1000 389 333 722 778 444 722 250 333 500 500 500 500 220 500 333 747 300 500 570 333 747 500 400 549 300 300 333 576 540 250 333 300 330 500 750 750 750 500 722 722 722 722 722 722 1000 722 667 667 667 667 389 389 389 389 722 722 778 778 778 778 778 570 778 722 722 722 722 722 611 556 500 500 500 500 500 500 722 444 444 444 444 444 278 278 278 278 500 556 500 500 500 500 500 549 500 556 556 556 556 500 556 500 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /FontDescriptor 9 0 R >> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /TimesNewRoman,Bold /Flags 16418 /FontBBox [ -250 -216 1178 1000 ] /MissingWidth 327 /StemV 136 /StemH 136 /ItalicAngle 0 /CapHeight 891 /XHeight 446 /Ascent 891 /Descent -216 /Leading 149 /MaxWidth 982 /AvgWidth 427 >> endobj 12 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F2 /BaseFont /Arial /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 278 278 355 556 556 889 667 191 333 333 389 584 278 333 278 278 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 278 278 584 584 584 556 1015 667 667 722 722 667 611 778 722 278 500 667 556 833 722 778 667 778 722 667 611 722 667 944 667 667 611 278 278 278 469 556 333 556 556 500 556 556 278 556 556 222 222 500 222 833 556 556 556 556 333 500 278 556 500 722 500 500 500 334 260 334 584 750 556 750 222 556 333 1000 556 556 333 1000 667 333 1000 750 611 750 750 222 222 333 333 350 556 1000 333 1000 500 333 944 750 500 667 278 333 556 556 556 556 260 556 333 737 370 556 584 333 737 552 400 549 333 333 333 576 537 278 333 333 365 556 834 834 834 611 667 667 667 667 667 667 1000 722 667 667 667 667 278 278 278 278 722 722 778 778 778 778 778 584 778 722 722 722 722 667 667 611 556 556 556 556 556 556 889 500 556 556 556 556 278 278 278 278 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 549 611 556 556 556 556 500 556 500 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /FontDescriptor 13 0 R >> endobj 13 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /Arial /Flags 32 /FontBBox [ -250 -212 1223 1000 ] /MissingWidth 279 /StemV 80 /StemH 80 /ItalicAngle 0 /CapHeight 905 /XHeight 453 /Ascent 905 /Descent -212 /Leading 150 /MaxWidth 1019 /AvgWidth 441 >> endobj 15 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F3 /BaseFont /TimesNewRoman,Italic /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 250 333 420 500 500 833 778 214 333 333 500 675 250 333 250 278 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 333 333 675 675 675 500 920 611 611 667 722 611 611 722 722 333 444 667 556 833 667 722 611 722 611 500 556 722 611 833 611 556 556 389 278 389 422 500 333 500 500 444 500 444 278 500 500 278 278 444 278 722 500 500 500 500 389 389 278 500 444 667 444 444 389 400 275 400 541 778 500 778 333 500 556 889 500 500 333 1000 500 333 944 778 556 778 778 333 333 556 556 350 500 889 333 980 389 333 667 778 389 556 250 389 500 500 500 500 275 500 333 760 276 500 675 333 760 500 400 549 300 300 333 576 523 250 333 300 310 500 750 750 750 500 611 611 611 611 611 611 889 667 611 611 611 611 333 333 333 333 722 667 722 722 722 722 722 675 722 722 722 722 722 556 611 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 667 444 444 444 444 444 278 278 278 278 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 549 500 500 500 500 500 444 500 444 ] /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /FontDescriptor 16 0 R >> endobj 16 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /TimesNewRoman,Italic /Flags 98 /FontBBox [ -250 -216 1168 1000 ] /MissingWidth 379 /StemV 73 /StemH 73 /ItalicAngle -11 /CapHeight 891 /XHeight 446 /Ascent 891 /Descent -216 /Leading 149 /MaxWidth 973 /AvgWidth 402 >> endobj 17 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F4 /BaseFont /Symbol /FirstChar 30 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 600 600 250 333 713 500 549 833 778 439 333 333 500 549 250 549 250 278 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 278 278 549 549 549 444 549 722 667 722 612 611 763 603 722 333 631 722 686 889 722 722 768 741 556 592 611 690 439 768 645 795 611 333 863 333 658 500 500 631 549 549 494 439 521 411 603 329 603 549 549 576 521 549 549 521 549 603 439 576 713 686 493 686 494 480 200 480 549 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 620 247 549 167 713 500 753 753 753 753 1042 987 603 987 603 400 549 411 549 549 713 494 460 549 549 549 549 1000 603 1000 658 823 686 795 987 768 768 823 768 768 713 713 713 713 713 713 713 768 713 790 790 890 823 549 250 713 603 603 1042 987 603 987 603 494 329 790 790 786 713 384 384 384 384 384 384 494 494 494 494 600 329 274 686 686 686 384 384 384 384 384 384 494 494 494 600 ] /FontDescriptor 18 0 R >> endobj 18 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /Symbol /Flags 6 /FontBBox [ -250 -220 1252 1005 ] /MissingWidth 333 /StemV 109 /StemH 109 /ItalicAngle 0 /CapHeight 1005 /XHeight 503 /Ascent 1005 /Descent -220 /Leading 225 /MaxWidth 1043 /AvgWidth 600 >> endobj 2 0 obj [ /PDF /Text ] endobj 5 0 obj << /Kids [4 0 R 14 0 R 21 0 R 24 0 R ] /Count 4 /Type /Pages /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] >> endobj 1 0 obj << /Creator /CreationDate (D:20020926100358) /Title /Author /Producer (Acrobat PDFWriter 5.0 for Windows NT) >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Pages 5 0 R /Type /Catalog >> endobj xref 0 27 0000000000 65535 f 0000030861 00000 n 0000030725 00000 n 0000031333 00000 n 0000006505 00000 n 0000030756 00000 n 0000023976 00000 n 0000025065 00000 n 0000025325 00000 n 0000026424 00000 n 0000000019 00000 n 0000006484 00000 n 0000026694 00000 n 0000027781 00000 n 0000014912 00000 n 0000028035 00000 n 0000029131 00000 n 0000029401 00000 n 0000030467 00000 n 0000006647 00000 n 0000014891 00000 n 0000022315 00000 n 0000015068 00000 n 0000022294 00000 n 0000023820 00000 n 0000022471 00000 n 0000023799 00000 n trailer << /Size 27 /Root 3 0 R /Info 1 0 R /ID [<6e0a5155704c3449b1ddae4e7230e492><6e0a5155704c3449b1ddae4e7230e492>] >> startxref 31382 %%EOF